Hello everyone! A
while back, I mentioned that I would use 3 examples of school shootings for
future blogs, which were the Columbine shooting, the NVCC Woodbridge attempted shooting,
and the Sandy Hook Shooting. Well, today
I will discuss the reasons why these shooters committed horrible acts upon
innocent people.
Before Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot and killed many of
their high-school peers and teachers, numerous people automatically assumed the
reason why they did this was a simple one.
Maybe it was because they wanted to get even with those who ignored them
in school and wanted a chance to feel more powerful than them? After all these years, that is actually not
the main reason. It has been revealed
that Harris and Klebold wanted to do something far grander than what Oklahoma City
bomber Timothy McVeigh had done by placing bombs in the school, open fire on
those who were not within the blast radius, and detonate bombs that were hidden
in their cars when people would arrive to survey the damage (Cullen).
Dylan Klebold was a depressed person while at the same time
being volatile…the kind of person willing to act on impulse. Eric Harris was the one that was much more
complex, almost fitting the description of a psychopath. Dave Cullen states that a definition of a
psychopath is that they “are rational and aware of what they are doing and why.
Their behavior is the result of choice, freely exercised” (“The Depressive and
the Psychopath…”). Many of Harris’
rantings in his journals were about how he despised an aspect of life people
liked that he did not or a fault in other people’s lives. Some of these factors Harris disliked
included country music, people who believed wrestling was one hundred percent
authentic, or those who were obsessed with the Star Wars franchise
(Cullen). With an intense hatred for
something that Harris had no control over, attacking a mass crowd of people
along with Dylan Klebold would seem like a reasonable solution to him.
Michael Hamilton, the attempted shooter of the Woodbridge
campus of Northern Virginia Community College, had a simpler reason than
Klebold and Harris. Hamilton had failed
many of his classes at the college. When
he received bad grades from his teacher, Tatyana Kravchuck, he could not handle
it anymore. Michael Hamilton believed that killing
Professor Kravchuck would be a way of releasing “pent up anger” (Stewart). Fortunately, Hamilton’s rifle would jam
before a bullet could strike Professor Kravchuck (Stewart).
Adam Lanza had an illness that would create an uncomfortable
feeling around bright lights, loud sounds and certain textures. This would eventually lead him to have a
difficult time connecting to others including his family (Lysiak). When alone, Lanza would develop a fascination
with mass murders, which affected his mindset on life. There was this constant belief that “society
was trying to manipulate him into following an immoral value system that led
millions to both mental and physical sickness” (Lysiak). These delusions had Lanza become a member of
a website dedicated to mass-shooters called “Shocked Beyond Belief” and express
his hatred for many aspects of life. Lanza
decided that “children were indoctrinated from a very young age to become part
of a sick-machine that was self-perpetuating” and were “manipulated to live
unhealthy lives” (Lysiak). Lanza
believed that killing students at Sandy Hook Elementary would be a favor
(Lysiak).
Cullen, Dave. “The
Depressive and the Psychopath: At last we know why the Columbine killers did
it.” Slate. The Slate Group, 20 Apr. 2004. Web. 4
Mar. 2014.
Lysiak, Matthew. “Why
Adam Lanza Did It.” Newsweek. IBT MEDIA INC, 17
Jan. 2014. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.
Stewart, Amanda. “Detective:
NVCC shooter had 'pent-up anger'.” Stafford County Sun. N.p., 21 Dec. 2012. Web. 4
Mar. 2014.
I like this post because you go beyond the summary of the events and into the psyche of the shooters. This is an important way to discuss violence in schools: to get at the impulses and psychological makeups of the shooters helps a society understand "triggers" and mental illness, too.
ReplyDeleteI think the next step would be to try to understand how our society punishes those with mental illness who use violence as a means of revenge, "justice" (I use quotes loosely here), and acute illness. What are our society's "rules" with regard to mental illness and weapons? Does mental illness or sickness negate a first-degree murder or attempted murder charge? And what can our society do to tighten gun laws and create a more comprehensive mental health system so that treatment happens sooner and crimes happen much less often? Just a few thoughts!